Blockchain based news organiztions

Select your location Close country language switcher. Blockchains will do for networks of enterprises and business ecosystems what enterprise resource planning ERP did for the single company. Blockchain will integrate information and process within and across enterprise boundaries and has the potential to streamline and accelerate your business processes, increase protection against cybersecurity and reduce or eliminate the roles of intermediaries. Greg Damalas. The EY Blockchain Global newsletter curates the latest developments and the news you need to know. Subscribe now.



We are searching data for your request:

Blockchain based news organiztions

Databases of online projects:
Data from exhibitions and seminars:
Data from registers:
Wait the end of the search in all databases.
Upon completion, a link will appear to access the found materials.

Content:
WATCH RELATED VIDEO: How Blockchain Could Revolutionize Social Media

AP, Chainlink to bring trusted data onto leading blockchains


Company Filings. Commissioner Caroline A. For those readers not already familiar with DeFi, unsurprisingly, definitions also vary. In general, though, it is an effort to replicate functions of our traditional finance systems through the use of blockchain-based smart contracts that are composable, interoperable, and open source. DeFi presents a panoply of opportunities. However, it also poses important risks and challenges for regulators, investors, and the financial markets. While the potential for profits attracts attention, sometimes overwhelming attention, there is also confusion, often significant, regarding important aspects of this emerging market.

These are crucial questions, and the answers are important to lawyers and non-lawyers alike. Many DeFi offerings and products closely resemble products and functions in the traditional financial marketplace. Both types of products offer returns, some directly, and some indirectly by enabling the use of borrowed assets for other DeFi investing opportunities.

In addition, there are web-based tools that help users identify, or invest in, the highest-yielding DeFi instruments and venues. These similarities should come as a surprise to no one, considering finance is in the name. It should also come as a surprise to no one that investing is often at the core of DeFi activity.

This movement is not about merely developing new digital asset tokens. Developers have also constructed smart contracts that offer individuals the ability to invest, to lever those investments, to take a variety of derivative positions, and to move assets quickly and easily between various platforms and protocols.

And there are projects that show a potential for scalable increased efficiencies in transactions speed, cost, and customization. These projects are evolving incredibly fast with new and interesting potential. Considering the relative infancy of blockchains that support the scripting needed for sophisticated smart contracts, DeFi development is particularly impressive. But these offerings are not just products, and their users are not merely consumers.

DeFi, again, is fundamentally about investing. Market participants who raise capital from investors, or provide regulated services or functions to investors, generally take on legal obligations. In what may be an attempt to disclaim those legal obligations, many DeFi promoters disclose broadly that DeFi is risky and investments may result in losses, without providing the details investors need to assess risk likelihood and severity.

Given this, many current DeFi participants recommend that new investors exercise caution, and many experts and academics agree there are significant risks.

While DeFi has produced impressive alternative methods of composing, recording, and processing transactions, it has not rewritten all of economics or human nature. Certain truths apply with as much force in DeFi as they do in traditional finance:.

Without a common set of conduct expectations, and a functional system to enforce those principles, markets tend toward corruption, marked by fraud, self-dealing, cartel-like activity, and information asymmetries. Over time that reduces investor confidence and investor participation. Conversely, well-regulated markets tend to flourish, and I think our U. Because of their reliability and shared adherence to minimum standards of disclosure and conduct, our markets are the destination of choice for investors and entities seeking to raise capital.

Our securities laws do not merely serve to impose obligations or burdens, they provide a critical market good. They help address the problems noted above, among others, and our markets function better as a result. But, in the brave new DeFi world, to date there has not been broad adoption of regulatory frameworks that deliver important protections in other markets. If investment opportunities are offered completely outside of regulatory oversight, investors and other market participants must understand that these markets are riskier than traditional markets where participants generally play by the same set of rules.

As an SEC Commissioner I have a duty to help ensure that market activity, whether new or old, operates fairly, and offers all investors a level playing field. To do this, the SEC has a variety of tools at its disposal ranging from rulemaking authority, to various exemptive or no action relief, to enforcement actions. If a project does not fit neatly within our existing framework, before proceeding to market , that project team should come and talk to us.

Our staff cannot offer legal advice, but they stand ready to listen to ideas and provide feedback, as developers know their projects better than we ever could. If the project is seemingly constrained by our rules, it is critical for us to get specific ideas about how these new technologies can be integrated into our regulatory regime to ensure the market and investor protections afforded by the federal securities laws, while allowing innovations to flourish.

That being said, for non-compliant projects within our jurisdiction, we do have an effective enforcement mechanism. For example, the SEC recently settled an enforcement action with a purported DeFi platform and its individual promoters.

But my preferred path is not through enforcement, and I do not consider enforcement inevitable. Broad non-compliance that necessitates numerous enforcement actions is not an efficient way to achieve what I believe are shared goals for DeFi. The more projects that voluntarily comply with regulations, the less frequently the SEC will have to pursue investigations and litigation. It is also not my goal to restrict investor access to fair and appropriate opportunities. But it is my job to demand that investors have equal access to critical information so they can make informed decisions whether to invest and at what price.

I am similarly committed to ensuring markets are fair and free from manipulation. Given this, it seems that there are two specific structural problems that the DeFi community needs to address. First, although transactions often are recorded on a public blockchain, in important ways, DeFi investing is not transparent. I am concerned that this lack of transparency contributes to a two tier market in which professional investors and insiders reap outsized returns while retail investors take more risks, get worse pricing, and are less likely to succeed over time.

It is unclear to me how well known this is in the DeFi retail investor community, but the underlying funding deals often grant professional investors equity, options, advisory roles, access to project team management, formal or informal say on governance and operations, anti-dilution rights, and the ability to distribute controlling interests to allies, among other benefits. Rarely are these arrangements disclosed, but they can have a significant impact on investment values and outcomes.

Retail investors are already operating at a significant disadvantage to professional investors in DeFi, [21] and this information imbalance exacerbates the problem. Some contend that DeFi is, in fact, more egalitarian and transparent because much of the activity is based on code that is publicly available.

Currently the quality of that code can vary drastically, and has a significant impact on investment outcomes and security.

If DeFi has ambitions of reaching a broad investing pool, it should not assume a significant portion of that population can or wants to run their own testnet to understand the risks associated with the code on which their investment prospects rely. It is not reasonable to build a financial system that demands investors also be sophisticated interpreters of complex code.

Instead, retail investors must rely on information available through marketing, advertising, word of mouth, and social media. Professional investors, on the other hand, can afford to hire technical experts, engineers, economists, and others, before making an investment decision. While this professional advantage exists historically in our financial markets, DeFi exacerbates it. DeFi removes intermediaries that perform important gatekeeping functions and operates outside the existing investor and market protection regime.

That can leave retail investors without access to professional financial advisors or other intermediaries who help screen potential investments for quality and legitimacy. These provide meaningful fraud reduction and risk assessment assistance in traditional finance, but there are limited substitutes in DeFi.

A second foundational challenge for DeFi is that these markets are vulnerable to difficult to detect manipulation. DeFi transactions occur on a blockchain, and each transaction is recorded, immutable, and available for all to see.

But that visibility extends only down to a certain identifier. Because of pseudonymity, the blockchain displays the blockchain address that sent or received assets, but not the identity of the person who controls it. Without an efficient method for determining the actual identity of traders, or owners of smart contracts, it is very difficult to know if asset prices and trading volumes reflect organic interest or are the product of manipulative trading by, for example, one person using bots to operate multiple wallets, or a group of people trading collusively.

There are specific U. Pseudonymity makes it much easier to conceal manipulative activity and almost impossible for an investor to distinguish an individual engaging in manipulative trading from normal organic trading activity.

In DeFi, because markets often turn on asset price, trading volumes, and momentum, investors are vulnerable to losses due to manipulative trading that makes those signals unreliable. To the extent transactions occur off public blockchains, it is even more difficult to assess whether trading is legitimate.

I recognize that in some ways DeFi is synonymous with pseudonymous. The use of alphanumeric strings that obscure real world identity was a core feature of Bitcoin and has been present in essentially all blockchains that have followed. But in the U. In return, they benefit from regulated markets that are more fair, orderly, and efficient, with less manipulation and fraud.

In moving to DeFi, I suspect most retail investors are not doing so because they seek greater privacy; they are seeking better returns than they believe they can find from other investments.

While some in DeFi believe in absolute financial privacy, I expect that projects that solve for pseudonymity are more likely to succeed, because investors can then be comfortable that asset prices reflect actual interest from real investors, not prices pumped by hidden manipulators. Projects that address this problem are also more likely to be able to comply with SEC regulations and other legal obligations, including requirements around anti-money laundering and countering the financing of terrorism imposed by the Bank Secrecy Act.

My respect for innovation does not lessen my commitment to help ensure all our financial markets are sustainable and offer average investors a fair chance of success.

DeFi is a shared opportunity and challenge. Some DeFi projects fit neatly within our jurisdiction, and others may struggle to comply with the rules as currently applied. It is not enough to just say it is too hard to regulate or to say it is too hard to comply with regulations.

It is a positive sign that many projects say they want to operate within DeFi in a compliant way. I credit their sincerity on this point, and hope they commit resources to collaborating with the SEC staff in the same spirit. Reimagining our markets without appropriate investor protections and mechanisms to support market integrity would be a missed opportunity, at best, and could result in significant harm, at worst. In conceiving a new financial system, I believe developers have an obligation to optimize for more than profitability, speed of deployment, and innovation.

Whatever comes next, it should be a system in which all investors have access to actionable, material data, and it should be a system that reduces the potential for manipulative conduct. Such a system should lead capital to flow efficiently to the most promising projects, rather than being diverted by mere hype or false claims. It should also be designed to advance markets that are interconnected, but with sufficient safeguards to withstand significant shocks, including the potential for rapid deleveraging.

In decentralized networks with diffuse control and disparate interests, regulations serve to create shared incentives aligned to benefit the entire system and ensure fair opportunities for its least powerful participants.

My staff and I have been actively engaged in helpful discussions with DeFi experts and my door remains open. We are also grateful to a variety of industry experts and attorneys who generously shared their time and ideas, and helped deepen my understanding of these questions. And finally, thanks to Dr. The views I express herein are my own and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Commission, my fellow Commissioners, or the SEC Staff. The term interoperable describes the ability to use DeFi protocols and applications across platforms and smart contracts.

Bank St. Louis Rev. While not the primary focus of this article, I share some of those same concerns. He also said that people were mortgaging their homes to free up funds with which to invest in DeFi, and that he was concerned the outcome could be scary.



A blockchain-based business model

By incorporating blockchain technology, Full Transparency Initiative reinforces our commitment to transparency while fundamentally changing the way visitors engage with a newsroom. We believe in the sanctity of facts and data. And that inspired us to set new benchmarks for corporate newsrooms. We built a blockchain-based tool to highlight the importance of trust and integrity in the business world.

With improved blockchain security and systems promoting on a given patient within an organization or network of organizations only.

What is holding back blockchain adoption and what should be done?

The seal of the U. It will initially trade securities, such as stocks or exchange-traded funds, first listed on its exchange, but those securities would be tradable on rival bourses. BSTX ultimately aims to expand trading to all U. Stock tokens are digital versions of equities pegged to the underlying share, usually traded in fractional units. In addition to traditional pricing data feeds, BSTX plans to offer a market data feed that will operate on a private blockchain. That feed will allow exchange members to see their own activity, as well as the activity of other BSTX participants on an anonymized, delayed basis, the exchange filing said. The exchange plans to expand its use of blockchain, the technology that underpins cryptocurrencies such as bitcoin, over time to support products like tokenized securities, Fraser said. The exchange will also give members the option to settle trades as quickly as the same day, as opposed to the current two-day standard settlement time, which would free up cash counterparties have to pledge against trades while also reducing the risk of either party defaulting. The securities industry as a whole is currently debating moving to single-day settlement.


Alas, the Blockchain Won’t Save Journalism After All

blockchain based news organiztions

According to a new update to the International Data Corporation IDC Worldwide Blockchain Spending Guide , blockchain spending will continue to see strong growth throughout the forecast period with a five-year compound annual growth rate CAGR of The pandemic highlighted the need for more resilient, more transparent supply chains, healthcare delivery, financial services, and so much more, and enterprises around the world have been investing in blockchain to provide that resiliency and transparency," said James Wester , research director, Worldwide Blockchain Strategies. This investment will have major implications in a very short time on everything from retail to financial services to capital markets. Share the image. Banking will remain the top industry for blockchain spending throughout the forecast although its share of spending will diminish slightly by

The digitalization of various areas of life - our civil society - has significantly changed daily processes and especially communication possibilities in the private, commercial and industrial sector. In view of current developments, no end to these developments is to be expected.

Crypto genius gives a billion dollars worth of joke coin for India covid relief

Provide people everywhere access to safe and affordable financial services. So people everywhere can live better lives. Moving money around the world should be as easy and cheap as sending a message. No matter where you live, what you do, or how much you earn. The Diem payment system will be accessible to anyone with an entry-level smartphone and data connectivity. Diem Coins are backed by a reserve of assets made up of cash or cash equivalents and very short-term government securities.


Reimagine your world.

The responsible use of innovation and technology enables WFP to build pathways to peace, stability, and prosperity for those recovering from conflict, disasters, and the impact of climate change. Blockchain technology is part of that solution. Building Blocks is designed to let people securely access assistance to meet their household essential needs according to their priorities. Concurrently, no sensitive information, such as names, dates of birth, or biometrics, are stored anywhere on Building Blocks. The system uses anonymous identifiers to ensure the privacy and security of people served.

News organizations like the Associated Press and the Los Angeles Times have blockchain-based systems could also provide a number of benefits in the.

The growing list of applications and use cases of blockchain technology in business and life

Up to 2 billion people worldwide lack access to authenticated medicines. More troubling is the human cost; , lives are lost per year in Africa to fake antimalarial drugs alone. Current efforts to reduce fraud in the global pharmaceutical supply chain are heavily reliant on time-consuming manual effort and lack transparency, with no robust chain-of-custody. Underlying data will be housed permanently in an immutable, blockchain-based ledger of record for use by researchers, public health and regulatory authorities, and organizations in the manufacturing and distribution supply chain.


Blockchain Technology: Shaping the Future of the Accountancy Profession

RELATED VIDEO: Blockchain Expert Explains One Concept in 5 Levels of Difficulty - WIRED

Inside the former North Face store on Hennepin Avenue whiteboards have replaced racks of parkas and hiking boots. Some boards pose big questions: What advice would you give to past generations? And how would you use this space to benefit the community? It looks like a coworking space meets a self-help conference, but The General Store is neither of those things. The larger the reputation each person or company has, the more influence they can wield within shared decisions of the DAO.

Adblock Plus is a browser extension and app that blocks advertisements and websites through the use of filtering lists. The tool automatically whitelists ads that meet the "acceptable ads" standards — so ads can avoid being blocked on this platform by adhering to those standards.

Welcome to the Diem project

Blockchain technology has moved past the hype — and hysteria — of cryptocurrencies and become a technology adopted by industry and governments as a solution for securing and streamlining processes across a variety of sectors. China has been a developer and rapid adopter of blockchain, particularly in areas such as finance, medicine, energy, and supply chains. Emerging technologies such as blockchain, a subset of distributed ledger technology, are not limited to a single region or use case. In pursuit of global competitiveness, China is a significant player in testing blockchain technology as well as implementing legal frameworks, regulations, and government initiatives around it. This working paper examines the country case of China and assesses how it has progressed in its attempts to test, adopt, and implement blockchain technology. While Bitcoin introduced the world to blockchain over a decade ago, the buzz continues around the underlying technology, distributed ledger technology DLT.

With 100 newsrooms on board, Civil launches blockchain-based publishing platform

Try out PMC Labs and tell us what you think. Learn More. The sudden development of the COVID pandemic has exposed the limitations in modern healthcare systems to handle public health emergencies. It is evident that adopting innovative technologies such as blockchain can help in effective planning operations and resource deployments.


Comments: 2
Thanks! Your comment will appear after verification.
Add a comment

  1. Bishr

    It no more than reserve

  2. Dakasa

    You are wrong. Email me at PM, we will discuss.