Blockchain public sector
If you told anyone ten years ago, non-bank entities could take over the role of banks, people could easily dispute your opinion. If asked the same about public roles, the no would be even more definite. But times change fast. The dawn of blockchain in brought about one of the most disruptive innovations of recent times. At first, the only blockchain firms developed were those launching cryptocurrencies or crypto exchange platforms.
We are searching data for your request:
Blockchain public sector
Upon completion, a link will appear to access the found materials.
Content:
- Chaining the building blocks for blockchain implementations in South Africa's public sector
- UK public sector ‘not taking up advantages of blockchain’
- 3 Potential Benefits of Blockchain for Government
- Blockchain in the Public Sector
- A Blockchain Guide to the Benefits, Frameworks, Initiatives, & More for the Public Sector
- Understanding of blockchain-based identity management system adoption in the public sector
- Welcome to GovChain
Chaining the building blocks for blockchain implementations in South Africa's public sector
The reports surfaced hundreds of government blockchain initiatives in dozens of countries and found that there was tremendous hype and promise for the use of blockchain for driving innovation and digital transformation in the public sector.
However, since then, we have not really seen breakthrough innovations in government, or a significant number of projects that have moved beyond proofs of concept or small pilots. This leads us to wonder, why has the private sector managed to make significant progress in leveraging blockchain, while efforts driven by governments have often stalled out?
To help answer this question, OPSI and the Digital Government and Data unit have collaborated with blockchain expert Juho Lindman associate professor of informatics at the University of Gothenburg, Sweden , who was identified through an open call , to review the latest research in the area, and to identify and analyse public sector experiences on successful and unsuccessful blockchain projects.
The report provides early and observational evidence on beliefs, characteristics and practices related to blockchain projects and the organisations that seek to implement them, with a focus on factors that lead to success or non-success. The report aims to cut through the hype around blockchain, equip public sector decision-makers with a better understanding of the current blockchain landscape, help officials take a critical look at potential use cases, and to assist them in their thinking as they consider and, if appropriate, initiate, manage, and de-risk blockchain technology projects.
In particular, this report:. The report provides an overview of the current situation and an overall framework to evaluate the benefits of blockchain services for a particular need using the three Vs viable, valuable, and vital checklist as applied to blockchain and associated use cases.
In general, blockchain should be pursued when it meets all three criteria. Technological breakthroughs are often — some would claim always — accompanied by unwarranted expectations and hype. This is not necessarily a bad thing: imagining the potential of technologies helps to make the possible use cases more concrete.
However, public discussion around blockchain is still often full of off-base expectations about the technology and its potential. Research conducted for this report has shed light on several recurring myths related to public sector blockchain. Each of these myths is discussed in the report. In reviewing successful and unsuccessful public sector blockchain projects, and by interviewing the teams behind them, we have documented early observations on factors that can lead to success and failure.
Factors that contribute to success and non-success are discussed in the report, and consist of:. Blockchain is an advanced topic that requires a certain level of organisational and team maturity. The report considers blockchain through the lens of the new OECD Digital Government Policy Framework DGPF , a policy instrument to help governments sustain high levels of digital maturity, and the Digital Government Index , the measurement instrument of digital maturity based on six dimensions.
For assessing the suitability and implementation of blockchain in the public sector, the report considers the level of maturity in organisations and teams through the six dimensions of the DGPF framework: digital by design, data-driven public sector, government as a platform, open by default, user-driven and proactiveness.
The report walks through a number of case studies of public sector blockchain projects, including those that have gained a real user base, which is the hallmark for blockchain success used in this report, as well as those for which blockchain did not fully meet expectations. In particular, the report covers:. The report also provides a longer list of additional blockchain use case that have gained users, which may warrant further analysis.
These topics and others can be found in the full video above. Although blockchain has yet to impact or disrupt the public sector in the ways that early hype had predicted, government decision makers will need to understand and continue to monitor this rapidly emerging technology closely.
Blockchain technology, when specifically and appropriately applied, may still hold significant potential for the transformation and innovation of public policies and services. We will continue to monitor developments in this area. If you know of any successful blockchain projects that have moved beyond pilots and have gained a strong user base that we should consider for future work, please let us know by adding it to the comments below.
To learn more, we encourage you to read the full report here , and to watch the video above. Your email address will not be published. Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment. Sign me up for the newsletter! Search for:. About our partners About our in-country contacts. New report discusses the uncertain promise of blockchain To help answer this question, OPSI and the Digital Government and Data unit have collaborated with blockchain expert Juho Lindman associate professor of informatics at the University of Gothenburg, Sweden , who was identified through an open call , to review the latest research in the area, and to identify and analyse public sector experiences on successful and unsuccessful blockchain projects.
In particular, this report: Helps public servants determine if a blockchain solution is viable, valuable, and vital to address a problem The report provides an overview of the current situation and an overall framework to evaluate the benefits of blockchain services for a particular need using the three Vs viable, valuable, and vital checklist as applied to blockchain and associated use cases.
Identifies and addresses top myths related to public sector blockchain Technological breakthroughs are often — some would claim always — accompanied by unwarranted expectations and hype. Myth Response Public blockchains are disrupting the public sector all around the world. So far, blockchain-related public services that have actual users are very rare. It is impossible to build successful blockchain applications for the public sector.
There is no obvious reason the public sector could not develop, implement, and use blockchain solutions. There is one obvious way to apply blockchain technology in the public sector. Blockchain could bring benefits to a number of areas. If you build it, users will come. Users need to be presented with the benefits of the services. If it is blockchain, it needs to be big and disruptive. Small, pragmatic, and evolutive blockchain implementations are just as valuable. Nobody knows how blockchains are implemented.
Technology and corresponding skills have developed in both the public and private sectors in recent years, and there is greater access to external skills e.
Uses for blockchain technology are much more limited in their scope. We are not tech people and should not care about detailed design decisions, such as blockchain. Decoupling design from the implementation does not seem warranted. Results of blockchain projects contribute to blockchain knowledge. Experimentation is important, but those lessons and takeaways should be shared. They often are not. Users care that services are based on blockchain. All other things being equal e.
Surfaces factors that contribute to success and failure with government blockchain projects In reviewing successful and unsuccessful public sector blockchain projects, and by interviewing the teams behind them, we have documented early observations on factors that can lead to success and failure.
Factors that contribute to success and non-success are discussed in the report, and consist of: Factor Contributes to: Description Clear value proposal Success The project must address a clear, specific business goal.
Appropriate technology Success The project must use appropriate fit-for-purpose technology. Stakeholder management Success The project must identify and manage relevant stakeholders. Experimentation Success The project must address problems encountered during implementation and pursue unforeseen opportunities. Assists government officials in understanding whether their organisation and teams have the digital maturity levels needed to explore blockchain Blockchain is an advanced topic that requires a certain level of organisational and team maturity.
Provides a series of case studies of blockchain on the frontlines The report walks through a number of case studies of public sector blockchain projects, including those that have gained a real user base, which is the hallmark for blockchain success used in this report, as well as those for which blockchain did not fully meet expectations.
In particular, the report covers: Groningen municipality Netherlands and Stadjerspas vouchers: Success despite blockchain. BlockCerts Malta academic certification. Tel Aviv Israel : Local currency gets pulled amid regulatory concerns. Voatz US : Blockchain-based complementary distance voting. Government of Karnataka India : Post education scholarship certification.
The full session can be viewed in the video above, but some key take-aways include: Ann Cathrin thinks there are potentially useful government blockchain use cases, but that it must focus on the end users. She cautioned the audience to look past the hype, and the need for extra scrutiny and serious discussion around blockchain for public services and government, as this is totally different than its use in start-ups.
It is one tool among other tools and is useful for certain purposes, where other tools may be more useful for other purposes. Experimentation helps to bring about certainty. Siim also flagged that blockchain is still a very young technology, and that we may have cycles of learning about it.
Experimentation is critical for uncovering this, and it requires time, energy, funding, and staff to do well. Ann Cathrin discussed that increased skills and understanding of blockchain in government could help make things more certain. Both panellists spoke on the topic of trust. While blockchains are often hyped as being a being able to create trust , Ann Cathrin and Siim believed this to not be appropriate for the public sector.
Ann Cathrin stated that blockchain should not be about eliminating the need for trust. Instead, trust needs to be promoted and earned, especially trust in government, as this is critical for the health of democracy.
At the end of the day, blockchain will always be interacting with humans, and we need to promote trust among them. Siim discussed how the greatest promise of blockchain is not to replace or create trust, but to promote For instance, blockchain can be used to ensure data integrity and fight misinformation. These things do not replace trust, but can help to earn and reinforce it. It provides additional assurances.
Ann Cathrin and Siim both considered whether blockchain might have significant promise for public sector transformation in the next years. Will blockchain meet its hype of being as important as the internet itself?
Probably not, according to Siim. Nor will it be the main driver of digital government. However, he does believe it will be useful as one tool in a stack of tools. The success in doing so, however, is taking a problem-oriented approach and using the right tech for the problem at hand. It is also important to work with civil society and other potentially impacted stakeholders and to ensure people have agency over their personal information and how it is used. Blockchain can make services more useful, but this needs to be done alongside the users themselves, according to Ann Cathrin.
Blockchain Digital and Technology Modernisation Emerging technology. Leave a Reply Cancel reply Your email address will not be published. The project must address problems encountered during implementation and pursue unforeseen opportunities. The deployment of projects with limited scalability may be impossible or not worth the effort; however, they may provide learning opportunities.
UK public sector ‘not taking up advantages of blockchain’
Hitachi Group Corporate Information. A virtual power plant VPP is a system that uses information and communication technology ICT to control and use distributed sources of energy such as photovoltaic power generation systems and storage batteries as though they were a single conventional power supply. In this demonstration project, the package is being used for the DRAS servers of participants such as Type A project members VPP infrastructure providers and Type B-1 project members who are aggregation coordinators. Overview of demonstration test. With recent advances in financial technology fintech accelerating the creation of new blockchain-based services, blockchain use is being studied by a variety of business areas not limited to financial services. In a demonstration test of a blockchain-based service, Hitachi's public biometrics infrastructure PBI has been used to create a coupon payment system with a user authentication function implemented on a blockchain platform.
3 Potential Benefits of Blockchain for Government
Our end-to-end innovation ecosystem allows clients to architect intelligent and resilient solutions for future missions. It takes partnership. We're building value and opportunity by investing in cybersecurity, analytics, digital solutions, engineering and science, and consulting. Our culture of innovation empowers employees as creative thinkers, bringing unparalleled value for our clients and for any problem we try to tackle. See how we deliver space defense capabilities with analytics, AI, cybersecurity, and PNT to strengthen information superiority. Learn how we cultivate a culture of inclusion and celebrate the diverse backgrounds and experiences of our employees. Each year, we celebrate the client engagements, leading ideas, and talented people that support our success.
Blockchain in the Public Sector
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc. For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact:. If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here.
A Blockchain Guide to the Benefits, Frameworks, Initiatives, & More for the Public Sector
A decentralised revolution is brewing. In the same way the introduction of the railways eased transport and trade in the UK, distributed ledger technology DLT can ease access to, and quality of, public services for the citizen. Better, more joined-up public services are vital to solving our biggest societal challenges. However, it is only in more recent years that steps have been made towards realising this potential. The UK public sector is known to be slow to adapt to new technologies, particularly digital ones.
Understanding of blockchain-based identity management system adoption in the public sector
The reason being that it has the potential to completely change how business, both professional and personal, is conducted globally. Like the rise of the internet, its current use is confined to several key areas such as cryptocurrencies but its potential applicability to many other sectors is becoming increasingly recognised. Instead, a copy of the ledger is stored by each user on the network and when any transaction is verified it is recorded on every stored ledger. In this way, every user has a copy of the ledger containing every transaction on the network, which is typically publicly available on the network, and no single central authority is required for this purpose, such as with banks, the commonly quoted example. With banks being the trusted third parties for the purposes of many digital financial transactions, it creates a single point of failure in the event of an attack. Having ledgers distributed and shared across a whole network makes it impossible or highly improbable for the ledger to ever be tampered with. Blockchain ledgers can also be public or private.
Welcome to GovChain
Watch now. Blockchain implementations are modernizing and streamlining procurement processes at the General Services Administration GSA. Proofs-of-concept POCs are giving the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention CDC the ability to improve real-time access to critical data and accelerate the response time of public health workers.
The functions of governments and public services are both vital and diverse. Governments provide leadership, public services, and national security, they define key parameters for our everyday life, maintain order, and provide economic security and assistance. Well functioning public services are crucial for the functioning of society and hence this in turn has a large impact on the economy. However, the public perception of how the majority of governments function is all too often defined as cumbersome, opaque and inefficient.
This study aims to understand the benefits and challenges associated with the adoption of a blockchain-based identity management system in public services by conducting an academic literature review, and to explore the design of such a system that can be applied to the Korean government. This study explores the adoption of a blockchain-based identity management system using a literature review and an actual design case intended for use by the government sector. Blockchain-based identity management systems can significantly improve transparency, accountability, and reliability in the user control of one's own data while reducing the time and cost needed to deliver public services, as well as increasing administrative efficiency. However, it is not always easy to implement such systems, and introducing new technologies in the government field requires a complicated, time-consuming process. There is currently an appetite for research extending beyond the typical technology-driven approach to elucidate the government adoption of new technologies and explore its implications. The idea behind this system is that by storing and managing personal information on the blockchain and providing mobile apps to customers, users can log in or retrieve previously authenticated personal information without having to go through an authentication process. Since users do not need to go through the verification process every time, it is expected that they will be able to access only the necessary personal information more quickly and conveniently without having to deal with unnecessary details.
The One Brief is Aon's weekly guide to the most important issues affecting business, the economy and people's lives in the world today. Public Sector expert Bill Sulman, examines the benefits blockchain could bring to the public sector. Blockchain is often associated with the cryptocurrency Bitcoin, but this technology has the potential to transform a wide range of operations. Shrouded in mystery and its fair share of jargon, blockchain technology offers a secure and transparent way to record transactions.
Sorry, not in that section .....
people, what news from the front?
Make mistakes. I propose to discuss it.