How many confirmations are needed for bitcoin

The bitcoin network is a peer-to-peer payment network that operates on a cryptographic protocol. Users send and receive bitcoins , the units of currency, by broadcasting digitally signed messages to the network using bitcoin cryptocurrency wallet software. Transactions are recorded into a distributed, replicated public database known as the blockchain , with consensus achieved by a proof-of-work system called mining. Satoshi Nakamoto , the designer of bitcoin, claimed that design and coding of bitcoin began in The project was released in as open source software. The network requires minimal structure to share transactions.



We are searching data for your request:

Databases of online projects:
Data from exhibitions and seminars:
Data from registers:
Wait the end of the search in all databases.
Upon completion, a link will appear to access the found materials.

Content:
WATCH RELATED VIDEO: What Are Bitcoin Blocks and Bitcoin Confirmations ?

How Many Confirmations Does Bitcoin Need?


If you're seeing this message, it means we're having trouble loading external resources on our website. To log in and use all the features of Khan Academy, please enable JavaScript in your browser. Donate Login Sign up Search for courses, skills, and videos. Economics Finance and capital markets Money, banking and central banks Bitcoin. Bitcoin: Cryptographic hash functions. Bitcoin: Digital signatures.

Bitcoin: Transaction records. Bitcoin: Proof of work. Bitcoin: Transaction block chains. Bitcoin: The money supply. Bitcoin: The security of transaction block chains. Current timeTotal duration Google Classroom Facebook Twitter. Video transcript A proof of work protocol is a vehicle really by which somebody can effectively prove to you that they've engaged in a significant amount of computational effort.

Proof of work protocols often amount to puzzles. And these puzzles that can, on the one hand, be challenging to solve-- and by that I mean they require some serious computational effort and really can't be short circuited-- but on the other hand, that effort can actually be easily verified, and it can be verified in far less time than it took to conduct that effort in the first place.

And there are a number of applications of such protocols. So for example, if you've heard of the Bitcoin, the Bitcoin electronic payment system, that system actually leverages a proof of work scheme within the context of creating what are known as transaction block chains.

Now aside from Bitcoin, which is a very recent user of these types of proof of work schemes, these schemes have been proposed in the past for other applications. For example, proof of work schemes have been proposed for doing things like deterring denial-of-service attacks, or DoS attacks.

And here the idea is that the requester of a particular service would have to solve a very specific computational problem, a proof of work puzzle, before being allowed to use a service. And the idea here is that the computational effort exerted is effectively a way to throttle the requester. The responder can, in turn, easily check if the requester carried out the requisite work, and only if that work was carried out will the responder respond to that request for service.

Now the original application for these types of proof of work protocols, the first place that I've seen it proposed, is in the context of being able to deter spam email. And then obviously, we all know what spam email is hopefully. These are messages that you don't want in your inbox that maybe come to you in an unsolicited fashion. And the idea here is that a proof of work protocol, it turns out it can be tied to a particular email message.

And this is conceptually like affixing a postage stamp to a message, but rather than paying for that stamp using money, you're basically paying for that stamp via CPU cycles.

So for a legitimate sender who is only sending out a small number of messages, this type of proof of work protocol will not amount to very much. It's going to be a minor deterrent since it's only executed a very small number of times.

It's kind of an impediment, but it's not something that's so unreasonable. Now for a spammer, who might be sending out a lot of messages, maybe hundreds of thousands, or millions of messages, it might be prohibitively expensive to repeatedly expend so many CPU cycles for each message and each sender to whom that message is being sent.

So hopefully this gives you a flavor for some of the applications of these proof of work protocols. Let me actually dive in to how they work in practice. So first of all, the way that I like to think of these protocols is that typically, they work relative to a given challenge string. And I'm going to call this challenge string-- we'll label it with the letter c.

So c's going to be kind of a challenge string. And what the person trying to engage in the protocol will do, the prover of the work, will basically try to come up with a corresponding proof that is tied to this challenge string. It's going to be kind of a response associated with this challenge. It has a very specific mathematical property in relation to this challenge. And as you point out, maybe when I talk about a challenge string here, for example in the context of spam, this challenge string might actually represent an email message.

So it's going to be something very specific to the task at hand. Now what the prover will do is come up with a response string, and let's call the response string r. Actually, let's use the term p for it, since maybe we can think of it as a proof, a proof or a response.

And the idea is that the prover will come up with this proof or response string, and he has to come up with a string such that, when you concatenate the challenge and the response, and you take the two together, and you apply a cryptographic hash function-- so let's say I come up with a cryptographic hash function, like SHA, or anything of that nature.

If I take the challenge string and the proof string and concatenate together and apply the cryptographic hash function, apply these mathematical transformations that represent the cryptographic hash function, I want to come up with a proof string such that the output under this hash function will have a very specific property.

The prefix of the output, the first large number of bits will all be 0. So let's say the first 40 bits, or first 30 bits, or some number of bits will be 0. And then the other bits can be whatever they would normally be.

So obviously, what you're trying to do here is come up with a proof string that has a relationship with the challenge string. And that relationship happens to be one that is taken with respect to a particular hash function, and really incorporates or considers what the output of the hash function will be when the proof string is concatenated with the challenge string.

And if you, let's say, have a good cryptographic hash function, then the only known way to find this type of a proof string is to effectively try a lot of different possibilities, effectively doing brute force, by trying a lot of different proof strings until you find one that works. Now if you, let's say, needed to find an output that contained about 40 consecutive 0's in it, that would require you to perform about 2 to the power 40 steps, 2 to the power 40 different hash function indications.

You'd have to try 2 to the 40 different strings, and one of them what would likely work if you tried 2 to the 40 such strings. That actually requires you to try about, and 2 to the 40 just to give you a sense, is approximately 1 trillion. So if you tried a trillion different strings out, and you hashed them each, you would likely come up with one string that had the first 40 bits being 0.

Now sometimes it might take you a lot less than a trillion steps. Sometimes it might take you a little bit more. You may get very lucky. You might get very unlucky. But on average, it will take you about 1 trillion steps to find a string where the first 40 bits are equal to 0. So this is something that's not easy, but it's also not outside the realm of possibility.

Now to understand why it's really hard to solve these types of proof of work schemes more efficiently than maybe simply doing brute force, I think it's helpful to recall that the output of a cryptographic hash function looks more or less random.

In fact, each output bit looks like a series of coin flips. So it's kind of like flipping the coin, and if it comes up heads, you would have a 0, and if it comes up tails, you can think of it as a 1.

And so what you're really doing is saying, if I flipped 40 coins, what are the odds that you would have 40 consecutive heads on those 40 coin flips? Now obviously that likelihood is very small, but it's not outside the realm of possibility. If you flipped 40 coins and you flipped those 40 coins about a trillion times, you would actually expect to see one instance in which all 40 coins came up as heads out of a trillion tries.

Now one interesting thing with these proof of work schemes, is they can be ratcheted up or ratcheted down. So for example, let's say you want to require even more computational heavy lifting to come up with a correct proof string. Let's say you want to increase the work that's going to be proved here.

What you can effectively do, in that case, is you could just increase the requirement on a number of leading 0's. So every time you add an additional 0, you effectively double the computational horsepower needed on average. And that's because you effectively requiring one more coin flip to come up heads, and that entails doubling the number of coin flips. So if I had 41 coin flips and I required 41 straight heads, that would require about twice as much effort as just requiring 40 straight heads.

And likewise, every time you remove a 0 from consideration, or the requirement, that will reduce the computational horsepower needed to about half of what it was previously.

So for example, if I only required the first 39 bits to be 0, that would require about half as many coin flips as requiring the first 40 bits to be 0. Now the neat thing is that once you come up with a solution-- let's say that somebody tries a trillion times and they finally come up with a proof string that works-- it's very easy to validate that this proof string is in fact a correct proof of work. All you have to do is, you take the challenge and you take the proof string and you hash them together.

So for example, if somebody proposes this one string, let's call it p prime, all you do is you take the challenge and you take p prime, and you input them into a hash function, and you see if the first 40 bits are all 0. So all this requires you to do is apply a hash function once to the concatenation of c and p prime, and you can verify that the output indeed has the requisite number of 0's in front of it.

And if you see that the output has the requisite number of 0's, then you can consider the proof of work valid, because you know it must have taken somebody a lot of time, a lot of tries really, to provide or come up with the string p prime, such that the concatenation of c and p prime gives you a number of 0's under the application of this cryptographic hash function.

So as you can see, these schemes are quite simple, but quite clever at the same time. They really amount to coming up with a proof string that has a very specific, mathematical relationship with the original challenge string. So hopefully this video gave you a flavor for the mechanics of how these proof of work protocols work. Up Next.



Subscribe to RSS

Are you interested in testing our corporate solutions? Please do not hesitate to contact me. Industry-specific and extensively researched technical data partially from exclusive partnerships. A paid subscription is required for full access. Additional Information. Monthly figures are as of the end of that particular month. Figures have been rounded.

Information on crypto deposit settings and blockchain confirmations. The list of supported cryptocurrencies for deposits into the safe-crypto.me App can be.

Bitcoin: Proof of work

How many confirmations a bitcoin needs? The answer to this question is a minimum of three to six if you wish a completely safe. Still, this mostly depends on the amount that has been transferred and on the exchange. Some exchanges will process the transaction after just one confirmation, while others will do so after the sixth. So one thing is for sure — for your transaction to be secured and safe, you will need at least three confirmations. Bitcoin confirmations are blocks being added to a blockchain after the transaction. The more confirmations blocks you have, the more secure the transaction is. Once you make a transaction with a bitcoin, it will be unconfirmed until a new block is created. In essence, all you need for a transaction to be in order is one confirmation, but in reality, this number is higher depending on the amount of money you are transferring and the type of the exchange.


Transaction confirmation

how many confirmations are needed for bitcoin

Perhaps you bought some illegal narcotics on the Silk Road half a decade ago, back when that digital black market for every contraband imaginable was still online and bustling. You might already regret that decision, for any number of reasons. After all, the four bitcoins you spent on that bag of hallucinogenic mushrooms would now be worth about as much as an Alfa Romeo. But one group of researchers wants to remind you of yet another reason to rue that transaction: If you weren't particularly careful in how you spent your cryptocurrency, the evidence of that drug deal may still be hanging around in plain view of law enforcement, even years after the Silk Road was torn off the dark web. Researchers at Qatar University and the country's Hamad Bin Khalifa University earlier this week published findings that show just how easy it may be to dredge up evidence of years-old bitcoin transactions when spenders didn't carefully launder their payments.

Bitcoin transaction confirmation is needed to prevent double-spending of the same money. One of the main advantages of bitcoin is that it avoids the problem of double-spending , i.

The Bitcoin Double-Spend That Never Happened

Find centralized, trusted content and collaborate around the technologies you use most. Connect and share knowledge within a single location that is structured and easy to search. I am writing a bitcoin app and looking to implement a 'cancel' feature. All over reddit are references that if under 3 confirmation have occurred, technically a payment can be stopped. Maybe only a minute or 2 available, but still. I cannot find any reference in the bitcoin api docs to demonstrate how this would be done.


How Long Does A Bitcoin Transaction Take? Common Bitcoin Questions

This article contains information about how to use Trezor Wallet to receive payments. Once you have initialized your Trezor , your Trezor Wallet is ready to be used. You should now see the home screen with an empty wallet see the screenshot. By clicking on Account 1 , you will see an empty Transactions tab. Now you are ready to receive your first coins. Select the cryptocurrency that you would like to receive in the top left corner of the screen. A number of other cryptocurrencies can be accessed using third-party wallets. For the full list of supported cryptocurrencies, click here.

How confirmations work with Coinmama. When you buy cryptocurrency, the confirmation process looks like this: You place an order with Coinmama; Your payment is.

Deposit Issues

Bitcoin transactions have hundreds to thousands of confirmations from their networks to confirm that they are real transactions. CoinList waits for 6 confirmations to consider the transaction - this can take anywhere from thirty minutes to twelve hours. Funds held in cold storage are covered under the insurance policies of our custodian partners. Please note, not all funds are held in cold storage at all times.


User manual:Receiving payments

Wait for a sufficient number of blocks as confirmations to ensure that a transaction added into blockchain is immutable with high probability. Due to forking, the immutability of a blockchain using Nakamoto consensus is probabilistic. Due to the longest chain wins rule of the Nakamoto consensus, the current longest chain of blocks could be overtaken by another branch of blocks with non-zero probability. Then the transactions included in the current chain of blocks is no longer considered valid.

The first use of Bitcoin was in when it was released as open-source software.

Bitcoin Confirmations: What Is It & How To Check It?

Next to Bitcoin, Ethereum is the second most popular digital currency. However, unlike Bitcoin and other altcoins , Ethereum has been designed as more than just a store of value or a medium of exchange. The Ethereum network is a decentralized and open-source computing network and operating system used for creating smart contracts and decentralized applications. Same as Bitcoin and other digital currencies, Ethereum works on a blockchain network basis. A blockchain is a distributed, decentralized public ledger on which all the cryptocurrency transactions are recorded and confirmed. The term distributed means that anyone that participates in the Ethereum network has an equivalent copy of the public ledger, which allows the participants to have an insight into all previous transactions.

How many confirmations does OpenNode require?

Bitcoin Basics. How to Store Bitcoin. Bitcoin Mining.


Comments: 4
Thanks! Your comment will appear after verification.
Add a comment

  1. Hanly

    Sorry that I intervene, but I propose to go by another way.

  2. Fitz S.

    OOOOOOOOOOOOOOO !! I have long wanted to see this !!!!

  3. Maujin

    You are saying.

  4. Unwine

    Yes, to answer in time, it is important