Mashable explains bitcoin wiki
Every publishes essays on productivity, strategy, crypto, and the creator economy from a collective of thoughtful and experienced operators in tech. Revealing the systems in the tech world that drive what we see in the headlines, focusing primarily on the tech giants: Amazon, Apple, Facebook, Google, and Microsoft. The news and commentary we've posted throughout the past 24 hours, so you won't miss a big story. Delivered Sunday through Friday.
We are searching data for your request:
Mashable explains bitcoin wiki
Upon completion, a link will appear to access the found materials.
Content:
- Craig Steven Wright
- Amir Taaki
- Stratum mining. All about cryptocurrency - BitcoinWiki
- Oh no, there's been an error
- China Money GIF by Marcie LaCerte
- Diáspora (rede social)
- Non-fungible token (NFT)
- Op Ed: How Many Wrongs Make a Wright?
- Grants:APG/Proposals/2013-2014 round1/Wikimedia UK/Impact report form
- Squid Game ending explained and all your burning questions answered
Craig Steven Wright
FDC funds are allocated to improve the alignment between the Wikimedia movement's strategy and spending; support greater impact and progress towards achieving shared goals; and enable all parts of the movement to learn how to achieve shared goals better and faster. Funding should lead to increased access to and quality of content on Wikimedia project sites — the two ultimate goals of the Wikimedia movement strategic priorities , individually and as a whole.
Funded activities must be consistent with the WMF mission, must be for charitable purposes as defined in the grant agreement, must be reported to WMF, and must otherwise comply with the grant agreement. The WMF mission is "to empower and engage people around the world to collect and develop educational content under a free license or in the public domain, and to disseminate it effectively and globally.
Each entity that receives FDC funding will need to complete this report, which seeks to determine how the funding received by the entity is leading towards these goals. The information you provide will help us to:. The purpose of this section is to provide a brief overview of this report. Please use no more than 2—3 paragraphs to address the questions outlined below.
You will have an opportunity to address these questions in detail elsewhere in this report. Also, we encourage you to share photographs, videos, and sound files in this report to make it more interactive, and include links to reports, blog posts, plans, etc as these will add context for the readers.
In the staff assessment of our original programme proposal, we were evaluated as "Potential impact on English language projects is high, with an active editing community, but the proposal is relatively unfocused and may not lead to significant impact on global targets.
Materials ready to be used to write Wikipedia articles at the Live Art and Feminism editathon in April. A tuning coil! Wikimedia UK has had a year-long project with Bovington Tank Museum, helping volunteers photograph the collection of tanks for Wikipedia.
The FDC requires information about how your entity received and spent money over the past year. The FDC distributes general funds, so your entity is not required to use funds exactly as outlined in the proposal. While line-item expenses will not be examined, the FDC and movement wants to understand why the entity spent money in the way it did. If variance in budgeted vs. This helps the FDC understand the rationale behind any significant changes.
Note that any changes from the Grant proposal, among other things, must be consistent with the WMF mission, must be for charitable purposes as defined in the grant agreement, must be reported to WMF, and must otherwise comply with the grant agreement. If you'd prefer to share a budget created in Google or another tool and import it to wiki, you can do so in the tables below instead of using wiki tables.
You can link to an external document, but we ask that you do include a table in this form. We are testing this approach in this form. As we fully absorb costs spreading overheads across budgets to accurately reflect our expenditure , the extra expenditure on the Chief Exec transition and the higher-than-forecasted staff cost have affected all budgets. Finally, planning for and managing Wikimania so that it was as successful as it was occupied the staff and office resources for a significant part of the year.
Four additional staff were employed and many of the direct costs were invoiced to Wikimedia UK. The text below is copied from wmuk:WMUK activities and volunteers. It defines terms used in the following report. To count as a WMUK activity, the charity or its volunteers, staff or trustees must have taken some leading role: merely attending is not enough. The charity does not claim as a WMUK activity external events or activities that fall outside the above definition, even if WMUK staff, trustees or volunteers attend or are involved in a non-leading capacity.
That is the case regardless of whether the individuals attend or are involved on behalf of WMUK. Rather than tracking the raw number of activities that the charity and its volunteers get involved with, without regard for their size, we instead focus on a measure of personal engagement that we call an activity unit. An activity unit is defined as one person attending one event. So, a score of 5 units may represent one person attending five separate events, or five people attending one event.
For this purpose, no distinction is made between people who lead or help to lead an event, and those who simply attend. If the event is a WMUK activity, then all attendees contribute one activity unit to the overall count. If the event is a non-WMUK activity, we count only the activity units contributed by volunteer attendees who are working with us in some way for that activity.
As we are primarily interested in external volunteer engagement here, we exclude the activities of WMUK staff or trustees when they are acting in their professional capacities. However, the following are not in themselves reasons to exclude from our activity counts:.
A leading activity unit is defined as one person taking a leading role in one event. That may include running or helping to run the event, or being one of the lead organisers of an online activity.
Leading activity units are recorded as a subset of activity units, so a person taking a leading role is counted as contributing both one activity unit and one leading activity unit. A WMUK leading volunteer is a person who has, at least once during the preceding 12 month period:.
The FDC needs to understand the impact of the initiatives your entity has implemented over the past year. Because the FDC distributes general funds, entities are not required to implement the exact initiatives proposed in the FDC proposal; the FDC expects each entity to spend money in the way it best sees fit to achieve its goals and those of the movement.
However, please point out any significant changes from the original proposal, and the reasons for the changes. For explanatory notes and definitions reference numbers in second column see wmuk:Strategy monitoring plan Notes and Definitions.
Our original programme had several weaknesses, such as a lack of clarity of what strategic priorities are addressed by particular programmes, or how we intend to track the quality of content. Our plan consisted of several fragmented initiatives; they all had targets associated with them, however, most were output oriented, and did not feed into one another. Most of these were operational tasks e. Activities were grouped together, but these collections did not have joint goals driving them, and this lack of common objectives caused a lack of clarity.
Our approach changed dramatically with the introduction of the new strategic goals framework described in programme 2b below. It allowed us to clarify strategic goals of various initiatives, and, importantly, introduced outcome oriented targets. Many initiatives across the organisation feed into the same targets, which made our activities more connected. It was then also possible, throughout the year's reporting, to show how our activities relate to their larger context.
We have also started employing Wikimetrics and CiviCRM in our data analysis, which gave us basis for more robust reporting. It is hoped that this change allows us now to implement more robust evaluation of our achievements.
Though there was a photography-related project grant proposed in Q4, it has not yet been approved and would in any case take place in June Not yet moved to Commons, but worth highlighting is the recent British Library collaboration. The British Library released a million images scanned from old books. This collection was first loaded onto Flickr so that crowdsourcing could take place. In particular Wikimedians and Open Street Map worked with the British Library to find maps and floor plans among the million.
This is a very exciting development, and we will continue supporting it. More information here. Between 1 February and 31 January a total of , files were uploaded to Wikimedia Commons with the support of Wikimedia UK. A number of sources have contributed to the final number of uploads:. Mass uploads and photography competitions have proven to be a good source of images, while loaning equipment to members has also been effective.
What we have learnt is that at the moment few volunteers have the skill and experience to use the mass upload tool, so in future it may be sensible to facilitate skill shares in order to have multiple volunteers working on upload projects - that is what we are hoping to do in We see it as a success that many of the uploads in came from an existing institutional partnership e.
For example in the case of Cancer Research UK WIR project, originally we were unsure if any images would be released at all, but thanks to the work of the resident it was made possible.
We encourage other chapters to learn from this project - [5]. And in general, we feel the achievements in this area constitute a success, given a solid number of images produced in a variety of topical contexts.
The Q1 figure previously reported omitted a course run by the University of Portsmouth, hence an increase of , bytes for that quarter. As the courses end in Q1 —16, do avoid double counting we are including just edits made before the end of 31 January As such, these two courses contributed 81, bytes of information.
Wikimedia UK supported 11 editing events in Q4. The Living Paths! One event worth highlighting is the translating editathon we supported in Q4. They checked whether the article existed in their target language Wikipedia, and whether it could helpfully be developed through translation.
We have strongly supported this initiative, and there are now signs that it will yield continuous engagement. In Wikimedia UK was involved in adding This is the equivalent of 2.
Throughout the year, editing through the courses extension has contributed 2,, bytes of information through six courses: the University of Portsmouth twice, University College London twice, Students 4 Best Evidence, and the University of Hull. To build capacity we implemented Campus Ambassador training - 3 sessions in , and are planning to build on these in The current courses are recurring thanks to continuous engagement from partners.
A report briefly summarising the various outcomes of volunteer project grants, many of which focus on content, can be found here. Looking back at how the grants performed in , we can draw several reflections and lessons.
This problem is additionally compounded by our experience that the editing process itself, even before nomination for review, tend to take longer than expected by even experience Wikipedia editors. We do ask our applicants about when they think they will finish the articles by, but we see that consistently the time needed is underestimated. We have been lucky on the other hand that our photography or video related grants have consistently generated high quality contribution.
On the reporting side, our workflow is such that often the first time we get in touch with the successful applicant and ask for a report is after their stated projected completion date.
This would allow for regular check ups, and help along the way - provided we can find capacity to do so.
We would encourage other chapters to do the same, if they aren't already. Grants for expenses for hosting of editathons suffer known issues related to one-off events where while new content are generated, and new editors trained, retention of these newly trained editors are limited or not monitored at all. Of the first group, 4, images were used in the mainspace of Wikimedia projects excluding the likes of metawiki and outreach wiki giving a usage rate of 2. As was mentioned in the Q1 report, exact figures for the book covers are unclear, but the latest report April indicates Considered together, this means that 3.
Before progressing further it should be noted that the figures for Q1 and Q2 have increased since the initial reports, as might be expected. In the Q1 report the usage of Commons uploads stood at 2.
Amir Taaki
SlideShare uses cookies to improve functionality and performance, and to provide you with relevant advertising. If you continue browsing the site, you agree to the use of cookies on this website. See our User Agreement and Privacy Policy. See our Privacy Policy and User Agreement for details. Create your free account to read unlimited documents. The SlideShare family just got bigger.
Stratum mining. All about cryptocurrency - BitcoinWiki
Subscriber Account active since. And he had an early start — he made his first investment at age 12, and became a millionaire at age Now at age 20, he's invested in a competitor cryptocurrency that he says will "kill" Facebook 's forthcoming Libra cryptocurrency. Read on for a timeline of the life of Erik Finman, from Idaho tween to Silicon Valley crypto-millionaire. Source: New York Magazine. Finman said his older brother brought him to a protest following the financial crisis of He recalls running from the police and seeing a man wearing a bitcoin shirt, and then asking him what bitcoin was. That prompted Finman to research the cryptocurrency himself and he decided, along with his brother, that it was the next big thing. Source: Cheddar.
Oh no, there's been an error
Non-fungible tokens are specialized types of cryptographic tokens that represent something unique or rare. A non-fungible token NFT is a specialized type of cryptographic token representing something unique, like a domain name, a limited-time skin for a video game, or other digital properties owned by a user. Therefore, the NFTs are not mutually interchangeable, meaning an individual might trade ownership of a domain name for ownership of a rare character skin or a cryptocurrency. NFTs differ from cryptocurrency; NFTs are entirely non-fungible, and they cannot be traded for something identical. Cryptocurrency is fungible and is exchanged for something that is of equal or identical value.
China Money GIF by Marcie LaCerte
Everything you need to know about the ending, plus season 2, that creepy Red Light Green Light doll and the oh-so-breakable candy shapes. In one unnerving game, contestants have to cross a bridge of glass panels, not knowing which can support their weight and which will shatter. In Squid Game , the disturbing but intriguing Netflix hit about a deadly tournament of children's games , the competition winds to a bloody resolution. Season 2 is in the works according to the creator , but in the meantime many questions are left hanging as the ninth and final episode of season 1 closes. Here are answers to eight burning Squid Game questions you may have after watching the dystopian Korean series. Warning: The following story includes huge spoilers for Squid Game , so if you haven't watched all the episodes, come back and read this after you're done.
Diáspora (rede social)
Thorentis on Jan 21, next [—]. He seems like somebody who is very concerned with taking credit for things. And not just in a "hey, I made that! This alone is enough for me dismiss his claims. Satoshi clearly intentionally wanted to remain unknown. It might be a real name, but it likely isn't. There was plenty of opportunity to reveal himself.
Non-fungible token (NFT)
This is a timeline of Bitcoin , attempting to describe the evolution of the cryptocurrency and its influence around the world. All Bitcoin Core version updates are included. The image shows pageviews of the English Wikipedia page Bitcoin on desktop from December , and on mobile-web, desktop-spider, mobile-web-spider and mobile app, from June ; to January The comparative chart below shows Google Trends data for Bitcoin Search term and Ethereum Search term from January to February , when the screenshot was taken.
Op Ed: How Many Wrongs Make a Wright?
We use cookies and other tracking technologies to improve your browsing experience on our site, show personalized content and targeted ads, analyze site traffic, and understand where our audiences come from. To learn more or opt-out, read our Cookie Policy. Vox audio helps you understand the world. From catching up on the most important news stories of the day to grappling with important discussions between deep thinkers to sparking curiosity about scientific mysteries, our podcasts offer an array of entry points to deeper understanding. Give them a listen and follow via your favorite podcast app so you never miss an episode.
Grants:APG/Proposals/2013-2014 round1/Wikimedia UK/Impact report form
It also classifies websites into categories. NetEase, Inc. It's designed to assist members in finding friends and classmates from school. ADrive is a file hosting service that provides cloud storage and backup for consumers, businesses, and enterprise-level users. Acer is a Taiwanese multinational hardware and electronics corporation.
Squid Game ending explained and all your burning questions answered
After a decade or so of the general sentiment being in favor of the internet and social media as a way to enable more speech and improve the marketplace of ideas, in the last few years the view has shifted dramatically—now it seems that almost no one is happy. Some feel that these platforms have become cesspools of trolling, bigotry, and hatred. Meanwhile, others feel that these platforms have become too aggressive in policing language and are systematically silencing or censoring certain viewpoints. Post Jul.
That?