Sierra leone elections blockchain
When Colombia is still surprised by the fiasco of the tarjetones for one of the partisan consultations on the electoral day of March 11, from Africa a poorer and backward country, Sierra Leone gives an example to the whole world of what elections are using blockchains Blockchain. It was on March 7, , and through the Swiss Blockchain startup Agora, this African country implemented this that allowed the safe transfer of information to a verifiable Blockchain registry, in which independent operators such as the Red Cross , the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology and the University of Freiburg were able to count and verify each vote and the final results of the elections. But in Colombia the complaint of vote buying, identity theft, errors in the cards for the visually impaired community and, of course, the lack of cards were part of the menu of a day in which, as a result, voices emerged again of analysts and citizens who, in social networks, expressed themselves in search of technological alternatives, from Blockchain to electronic voting. I just want to remind you that in Venezuela there is electronic voting and not with photocopied cards. They are data and must be given. Those who complain the most that there are no cards are the same that for years have sucked cock with the implementation of electronic voting.
We are searching data for your request:
Sierra leone elections blockchain
Upon completion, a link will appear to access the found materials.
- Which Countries Are Casting Votes Using Blockchain?
- The world’s first blockchain-powered election just happened in a war-torn, poor country
- Sierra Leone just became the first country in the world to use blockchain during an election
- Blockchain May Hold the Secret to Protecting Your Identity
- Civic Tech Weekly Mar 19: Sierra Leone’s Blockchain Election
- Sierra Leone Sets Electoral Records
Which Countries Are Casting Votes Using Blockchain?
The applications for blockchain technology — the decentralized tech that underpins cryptocurrencies — are virtually limitless. One of the more exciting — and controversial — areas is voting. Electronic Voting Machines EVMs and their software security have in the past been the targets of hacks and fraud , and blockchain has been offered as a viable tech alternative to traditional electronic voting methods.
The exercise has been a success; Agora stored over , ballots on its blockchain-based voting system, which also lets registered voters see the vote tally. The goal was to improve transparency and reduce suspicion of corruption in a significant democratic exercise in the country. This is the first time a government election is using blockchain technology Sierra Leone wishes to create an environment of trust with the voters in a contentious election, especially looking at how the election will be publicly viewed post-election.
By using blockchain as a means to immutably record ballots and results, the country hopes to create legitimacy around the election and reduce fall-out from opposition parties.
Similar proofs-of-concept and pilot projects using blockchain in elections and voting have been previously demonstrated in Denmark and Estonia , but this is the first time the exercise has been conducted on such a scale in the real world. The Western Area the administrative district where the exercise took place has a population of over 1.
The firm used a team of accredited observers in as many locations to enter the data of the votes into the blockchain system. Get stories of change makers and innovators from the startup ecosystem in your inbox. Please fill in this field. You have been successfully registered for our daily newsletter. For that reason, many US states and foreign nations have been moving back to paper If you believe that most countries will use some form of digital voting 50 years from now, then blockchain is the only technology that has been created which can provide an end-to-end verifiable and fully-transparent voting solution for this future.
Sierra Leone appears to be heading for a run-off election at the end of March after no clear candidate victories in the first round. Leonardo hopes that the success of the exercise will encourage the NEC to let Agora tally the run-off votes across the country. He also aims to eventually take the system to other countries in Africa, and eventually the rest of the world.
Trending Now Trending Stories. Read the full story. Latest Updates from around the world. Sign up to YourStory.
The world’s first blockchain-powered election just happened in a war-torn, poor country
Being a driving force behind the development of various social relations, the intensification of modern technologies forms new conditions for modernizing democratic institutions. Different innovations in the field of digital communications affect mechanisms for the realization of political rights and freedoms of a person and citizen, transform activities of public authorities and tools of their interaction with civil society institutions. In these conditions, innovations influence even traditional areas, including popular voting and lawmaking. The active introduction of distributed registry technologies affected the development of new methodological approaches and reformed the organization of elections. This technology has widespread use due to blockchain technology.
Sierra Leone just became the first country in the world to use blockchain during an election
Blockchain May Hold the Secret to Protecting Your Identity
Civic Tech Weekly Mar 19: Sierra Leone’s Blockchain Election
Blockchains have come a long way, but are they ready to be trusted with democracy? W hat exactly is the current voting process? You arrive at a specially designated location and walk into a private area away from prying eyes. You carefully mark a piece of paper and fold it over. Your vote is added to all the other votes and counted — usually under observation to avoid mistakes or something more sinister.
Sierra Leone Sets Electoral Records
Digital ledgers promise less-landmark innovation but benefits aplenty for the regulated world — if aptly used. An international shipment of consumer goods typically comes with about 20 sets of documents, many of which are paper-based and relate to trade finance. No more, according to an Accenture-led syndicate. Such is the promise of decentralised distributed ledgers that sequentially and immutably record and store data in a way whereby people have immediate access to the same information without having to pass through a central point. Its innovation was that a self-sustaining network under no peak control was created to allow strangers to make and accept payments over the unsupervised internet. The distributed-ledger solutions for the regulated world are likely to be less ground-breaking. Nonetheless, ledgers that are destined to be used in the regulated world could enhance productivity across many industries, even if they are not great advances on existing technology. A danger, though, is that these ledgers will create risks, even systemic ones, when used in critical spheres; namely, if they are used to tally general elections and by central banks in the monetary system.
Blockchain technology was used to verify the recent results of Sierra Leone's presidential race, the first time this was done to oversee a national election. West African nation Sierra Leone has employed Blockchain technology to verify its presidential election data. This was the first time Blockchain has been implemented in a governmental election and the first results have started coming in. Swiss-based Blockchain voting technology company Agora has been overseeing the project.
Being a driving force behind the development of various social relations, the intensification of modern technologies forms new conditions for modernizing democratic institutions. Different innovations in the field of digital communications affect mechanisms for the realization of political rights and freedoms of a person and citizen, transform activities of public authorities and tools of their interaction with civil society institutions. In these conditions, innovations influence even traditional areas, including popular voting and lawmaking. The active introduction of distributed registry technologies affected the development of new methodological approaches and reformed the organization of elections. This technology has widespread use due to blockchain technology. Although it was initially considered as an element of development in the information and financial spheres, now blockchain is gradually entering other spheres of human activity, including political, due to the high degree of security and confidentiality.
Now more than ever before, governance is digital : elections, identification, participatory governance, and civic engagement facilitated through ICTs have reached remarkable levels. Politics and government can simultaneously exist and function both online and offline. In theory, the digital transformation of governments has the power to improve political inclusivity and build resilient mechanisms to ensure accountability and participation in all aspects of governance. Innovating governmental processes has the potential to solve age-old issues, such as corruption or voter fraud. Yet in practice, innovation may bring disruption to both the practice and norms of governments. Without network readiness, adequate skills, and a regulatory framework that protects privacy and fosters ethics, innovative technologies can undermine the pillars of democratic governments and create malign space for unethical surveillance, disinformation campaigns, and information monopolies, for example. Building readiness is the first and foremost challenge faced by governments ready to transform themselves and the societies they govern.
Blockchain technology may have the potential to change in the world, but exaggerating its real-world accomplishments can only sow public distrust and set the industry back. The recent confusion and controversy over the role of Agora, a blockchain startup, in the Sierra Leone presidential election serve as a case in point. While an Agora executive has taken responsibility for media coverage that overstated its involvement, CoinDesk inadvertently contributed in our initial story , which revealed the news to the world for the first time on March 8. Rather, it provided an independent count of ballots that the official results could be compared against, and only for the Western district of Sierra Leone, not the whole country.