Using blockchain for voting

Stilgherrian is a freelance journalist, commentator and podcaster interested in big-picture internet issues, especially security, cybercrime and hoovering up bulldust. He studied computing science and linguistics before a wide-ranging media career and a stint at running an IT business. Claims that "voting on the blockchain" would increase election security have been found wanting and even dubbed "misleading" by researchers from Massachusetts Institute of Technology MIT. In their paper Going from Bad to Worse: From Internet Voting to Blockchain Voting [PDF] published on Monday, they wrote that internet and blockchain-based voting would "greatly increase the risk of undetectable, nation-scale election failures". The paper analyses and systematises previous research on the security risks of voting systems, both online and offline, and comes to a clear conclusion.

We are searching data for your request:

Using blockchain for voting

Wait the end of the search in all databases.
Upon completion, a link will appear to access the found materials.

Content:

• PoV: An Efficient Voting-Based Consensus Algorithm for Consortium Blockchains
• An Indian state is testing online voting based on blockchain technology
• Chandler to test blockchain technology for mobile voting
• Why blockchain-based voting could threaten democracy
• E-Voting using Blockchain
• EC explores potential of using blockchain tech for remote voting
• Ballotchain
• New MIT Paper Roundly Rejects Blockchain Voting as Solution to Election Woes
• Blockchain for Voting: A Warning From MIT

WATCH RELATED VIDEO: Bringing Voting Systems into the Digital Age with Blockchain - Annika Jacobsen - TEDxZurichSalon

PoV: An Efficient Voting-Based Consensus Algorithm for Consortium Blockchains

Over 10 years we help companies reach their financial and branding goals. Engitech is a values-driven technology agency dedicated. Follow My Vote has created end-to-end verifiable online voting software that is open-source and truly revolutionary.

The infographic below describes the end to end process of using our blockchain voting system to vote in an election. To learn more about blockchain technology, how it works, and how we actually use it in our voting platform, please visit our page on Blockchain Technology in Online Voting.

To summarize the above infographic, Follow My Vote is simply taking the current process of voting in an election on Election Day in a state with Voter ID laws and bringing that process entirely online, in an attempt to make it easier, more secure, and even more cost effective for everyone involved. When using our blockchain voting system, the voter would download and install the Follow My Vote voting booth on the personal device of their choice i.

From there, the voter would submit the appropriate identity information in order to have their identity verified by an Identity Verifier, which would be approved by the organization hosting the election ahead of time. Once their identity is verified, the voter would be able to request their ballot, at which point they are issued their correct ballot type by the Registrar. The voter would then complete their ballot and securely submit their vote s to the blockchain-based ballot box. To obtain proof of casting their ballot, the voter would have the option to print out a receipt.

If allowed by the organization hosting the election, the voter may vote early and could even re-enter the Follow My Vote voting booth to change their vote if they change their mind in the days leading up to the election. When the polls close on Election Day, the most current votes submitted by each voter would be considered the official votes; and, voters would be allowed to follow their vote into the ballot box to ensure that their vote was cast as intended and counted as cast.

If they choose to do so, each voter would also be allowed to audit each ballot in the ballot box to confirm the vote totals being reported by our blockchain voting system are accurate, without revealing the identity of each voter. At Follow My Vote, we want every voter to have faith in the democratic process, trust in their government, and feel like their voice matters.

To this end, our blockchain voting solution provides voters with a way to confirm that their voice has been heard and that election results, as a whole, are truly accurate. Will this allow preferential voting? I will not support a voting system unless it uses preferential voting. I am sure a way to allow it could easily be worked out.

There is no point in having verifiable voting if much bigger problems with voting are not also addressed. What prevents votes being bought and sold under this system? Under this system, if I can fill in and send the vote from my computer, from my own living room, someone could be there with me, to monitor how I vote.

Alternatively, I could simply sell my vote to someone, then email them the key to my vote. How does FollowMyVote stop a the wrong person using a key, or b someone being able to monitor in which way a vote was cast? As a side note, I know this is also a problem with postal ballots, but the ease and simplicity of online voting, by comparison, magnifies the problem, and in any case, most voting is currently via the ballot booth and not the postal ballot anyway.

Presumably there is no systemic problem with any number of write-in candidates for such balloting. Building trust for the system will require side by side testing with traditional balloting even if done on county level elections before used for state-wide voting. U S elections are conducted at the state level except that Congress has authority to mandate a uniform manner for conducting such elections for federal candidates in all states.

In my view blockchain voting can remove all excuses for the ballot censorship ballot access for candidates and parties which currently exists. If that is not done, blockchain voting does nothing but secure a regime of voter censorship. How can you prevent entire cities full of fake precincts from entering their own voter ID s to drown out the real vote?

Dear, Sirs, Mme, Professor could it be possible to focus some application of your research in improving safe and fraud free voting process for Democratic and transparent free and fair election process in third world countries, so as to get ride of the highest cause of dictatorship Bad governance,election rigging , corrupt governance,civil war and social crises in third world countries.

Helping transparency in election and good governance shall helps builds a better and peaceful world. What is a voter asks any favor or money from the candidate or people campaigning for the candidate?

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed. Twitter Facebook-f Pinterest-p Instagram. Comments 8. Brent Reply. Chace Reply. Piers Digby Reply. Frank Robinson Reply. Laurel Kaskurs Reply. Manoj Pandey Reply. Leave a comment Cancel reply Your email address will not be published.

An Indian state is testing online voting based on blockchain technology

Over 10 years we help companies reach their financial and branding goals. Engitech is a values-driven technology agency dedicated. Follow My Vote has created end-to-end verifiable online voting software that is open-source and truly revolutionary. The infographic below describes the end to end process of using our blockchain voting system to vote in an election. To learn more about blockchain technology, how it works, and how we actually use it in our voting platform, please visit our page on Blockchain Technology in Online Voting. To summarize the above infographic, Follow My Vote is simply taking the current process of voting in an election on Election Day in a state with Voter ID laws and bringing that process entirely online, in an attempt to make it easier, more secure, and even more cost effective for everyone involved.

Chandler to test blockchain technology for mobile voting

Chairwoman Ella Pamfilova has not acknowledged any major violations to date. The questions, not limited to the opposition, focus primarily on Moscow, a city of over 12 million, where more than 1. United Russia dominated the field, with no opposition candidates recommended by jailed opposition leader Aleksei Navalny's Smart Voting app winning individual seats. United Russia received seats; a share sufficient to retain a supermajority that allows it to pass legislation unilaterally. Three parties -- A Just Russia, the Liberal Democratic Party of Russia, and New People -- all received under 30 seats each, while another three, smaller parties gained one seat each. Five non-party-affiliated candidates also were elected. On September 20 and 23, they staged unauthorized protests in downtown Moscow attended by a few hundred people. A third protest is planned for September But Moscow developed its own system. National Security Agency documents.

Why blockchain-based voting could threaten democracy

This article offers an E-voting Electronic Voting approach that ensures security, privacy, and transparency. We have decided to use the blockchain system. Blockchain technology lowers the cost of centralized Clouds, Datacenters, and Networking Equipment, decreases the need for middlemen, and provides data privacy and transparency; all of which are critical for a fair election. An Architecture and Algorithm are suggested for the blockchain-based voting system. An internet of things IoT based system is designed to exchange data from the electronic voting machine and the nodes.

E-Voting using Blockchain

Main objective of the operation: Create job opportunities by promoting business competitiveness. The project wishes to implement the breakthrough idea of Crypto-Voting through the use of two connected one-way pegged sidechain-style blockchains: one to register voters and register their votes and another for counting the votes allocated to the various candidates. Crypto-Voting is the innovative integrated electronic voting system that Net Service S. The objective of the Crypto-Voting project is to study and develop a new electronic voting system integrated with one or more electoral event management procedures system set-up, credential distribution, voting, ballot collection, preference counting, publication of the results, etc. The system, previewed in Seville, within the IC3K September framework, will manage operationally three distinct phases of the process:. The e-voting system based on Blockchain technology.

EC explores potential of using blockchain tech for remote voting

A growing number of tech start-ups have even advocated for using blockchain technology, which they say would boost voter turn-out and improve public trust. But in a new paper looking at a range of examples, a team of MIT cybersecurity experts have come out strongly against using any form of blockchain-based voting, and said that online voting in general is much more vulnerable to being hacked than in-person or mail-in voting. They say that the physical nature of mail-in ballots make them much less susceptible to large-scale attacks compared to online voting, where exploiting a single vulnerability could impact every ballot at once. Though blockchain-based apps like Voatz have been deployed in state and county elections, researchers like paper co-author Mike Specter have previously shown that such systems suffer from serious security vulnerabilities enabling attackers to monitor votes being cast and even change or block ballots. Blockchain-based approaches require voters to use software for which a single bug could undetectably change what they see e.

Ballotchain

The use of blockchain in the public sector reached another milestone this month when West Virginia became the first U. While the voter participation through this platform was estimated to be small, the intention of the administrators was to test the technology in a pilot project with no immediate plans to implement it at a larger scale. The idea of using blockchain for elections is worth more than just an experiment, however.

New MIT Paper Roundly Rejects Blockchain Voting as Solution to Election Woes

RELATED VIDEO: Real World Blockchain Applications - Voting

As a technology, blockchain is quickly becoming unrivaled. Although the Internet has long been familiar with other peer-to-peer applications for file sharing, music streaming, and more, the idea that these types of networks can provide their own security and resources has only been around since In the decade since its inception, blockchain was mostly tied to the success of the technology that created it, bitcoin. In recent years, however, it has quickly become a star on its own. Developers who recognized the value of blockchain are now racing to create new use cases for it and put their ideas into production.

Blockchain for Voting: A Warning From MIT

Trusted and accurate elections, as perceived by citizens, are the bedrock of democratic legitimacy. They are massive undertakings: voting, counting, and results tabulation need to be conducted rapidly, transparently and with very narrow margins for error. They are also uniquely vulnerable to disinformation. As seen in the aftermath of the U. Since blockchain technology can safeguard data from tampering in a transparent way, could this technology strengthen free and fair elections? In this final blog post in our Building Trust in Democracy series, we will explore the various ways blockchain technology might help democracies conduct effective elections make sure to check out the first and second blog too.

With the U. A raft of start-ups has been hawking what they see as a revolutionary solution: repurposing blockchains, best known as the digital transaction ledgers for cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin, to record votes. Backers say these internet-based systems would increase voter access to elections while improving tamper-resistance and public auditability.