Cory doctorow bitcoin calculator
Click Here to See Trade Ideas! Risk-free with a 14 day refund guarantee. The partnership is expected to accelerate the capabilities both companies can provide to customers in the field, combining technologies in satellite imaging, Edge AI and data-driven decision making. Satellogic said it will leverage Palantir's Foundry platform to accelerate business processes, rapid image product delivery, AI model training and enterprise-wide data integration. Foundry is expected to further enhance Satellogic's image-processing pipeline, which will unlock advanced image and geospatial products for customers.
We are searching data for your request:
Cory doctorow bitcoin calculator
Upon completion, a link will appear to access the found materials.
Content:
- Today's links
- Make a donation
- Is Norton 360 Mining Ethereum In Your Computer? If It Is, They’ll Take a 15% Cut
- Why Palantir Shares Are Rising Today
- Dogecoin to allow annual inflation of 5 billion coins each year, forever
- Norton 360 Now Comes With a Cryptominer
- For the First Time Ever, a Magic: The Gathering Deck has been Copyrighted
- John Biggs
- TSA Agents Outwitted By Cory Doctorow's Unlocked, 'TSA-Safe' Suitcase
- How We Think About Storing Crypto is Broken
Today's links
If in The Code Economy Philip Auerswald managed to give us a succinct history of the algorithm, while leaving us with code that floats like a ghost in the ether lacking any anchor in our very much material, economic and political world. Benjamin Bratton tries to bring us back to earth. The problem is that Bratton, unlike Auerswald, has given us this schematic in the almost impenetrable language of postmodern theory beyond the grasp of even educated readers.
And the failure to understand and democratically regulate such technology leaves society subject to the whims of the often egomaniacal and anti-democratic nerds who design and run such systems. It is the Earth layer that I find both the most important and the most often missed when it comes to discussions of the political economy of code.
Far too often the Stack is represented as something that literally is virtual , disconnected from the biosphere in a way that the other complex artificial systems upon which we have come to depend, such as the food system or the energy system, could never be as a matter of simple common sense.
And yet the Stack, just like everything else human beings do, is dependent upon and effects the earth. As Bratton puts it in his Lovecraftian prose:. The Stack terraforms the host planet by drinking and vomiting its elemental juices and spitting up mobile phones. After its short career as a little computing brick within a larger megamachine, its fate at the dying end of the electronics component life cycle is just as sad.
The rare earth minerals upon which much of modern technology depends come at the cost of environmental degradation and even civil war, as seen in the Democratic Republic of Congo.
Although gains in efficiency have, at least temporarily, slowed the rate of growth in energy use. The threat to the earth from the Stack, as Bratton sees it, is that its ever growing energy and material requirements will end up destroying the carbon based life that created it.
Absent our abandonment of that form of civilization we really will create a world that is only inhabitable by machines and machine-like life forms such as bacteria. Wall-e might have been a prophecy and not just a cartoon.
Yet Bratton also sees the Stack as our potential savior, or at least the only way possible without a massive die off of human beings, to get out of this jam. A company like Exxon Mobil with its dependence on satellites and super-computers is only possible with the leverage of the Stack , but then again so is the IPCC. For the Stack allows us to see nature, to have the tools to monitor, respond to, and perhaps even interfere with the processes of nature many of which the Stack itself is throwing out of kilter.
The Stack might even give us the possibility of finding an alternative source of power and construction for itself. One that is compatible with our own survival along with the rest of life on earth. After the Earth layer comes the Cloud layer. It is here that Battron expands upon the ideas of Carl Schmitt. Control over the nodes of global networks, where assets are no longer measured in square miles, but in underwater cables, wireless towers, and satellites demands a distributed form of power, and hence helps explain the rise of multinational corporations to their current state of importance.
Bratton appears to see current geopolitics as a contest between two very different ideas regarding the future of the Cloud. There is the globalist vision found in Silicon Valley companies that aims to abandon the territorial limits of the nation-state and the Chinese model, which seeks to align the Cloud to the interests of the state. The first skirmish of this war Bratton notes was what he calls the Sino-Google War of in which Google under pressure from the Chinese government to censor its search results eventually withdrew from the country.
After the Cloud layer comes the City layer. It is in cities where the density of human population allows the technologies of the Stack to be most apparent. Cities, after all, are thick agglomerations of people and goods in motion all of which are looking for the most efficient path from point A to point B. Cities are composed privatized space made of innumerable walls that dictate entry and exit.
They are the perfect laboratory for the logic and tools of the Stack. As Bratton puts it:. We recognize the city he describes as filled with suspicious responsive environments, from ATM PINs, to key cards and parking permits, e-tickets to branded entertainment, personalized recommendations from others who have purchased similar items, mobile social network transparencies, GPS-enabled monitoring of parolees, and customer phone tracking for retail layout optimization.
Following the City layer we find the Address. In the Stack or at least in the version of it dreamed up by salesmen for the Internet of Things , everything must have a location in the network, a link to which it can be connected to other persons and things.
An unconnected object or person fails to be a repository for information on which the Stack itself feeds. What Bratton finds astounding is that in the Address layer we can see that the purpose of our communications infrastructure has become not for humans to communicate with other humans via machines, but for machines to communicate with other machines.
The next layer is that of the Interface. It is the world of programs and apps through which for most of us is the closest we get to code. Bratton says it better:. What are Apps? On the one hand, Apps are software applications and so operate within something like an application layer of a specific device-to-Cloud economy. However, because most of the real information processing is going on in the Cloud, and not in the device in your hand, the App is really more an interface to the real applications hidden away in data centers.
The App is also an interface between the User and his environment and the things within it, by aiding in looking, writing, subtitling, capturing, sorting, hearing, and linking things and events. The problem with apps is that they offer up an extremely narrow window on the world.
The rise of filter bubbles are the first sign of a reality crisis Bratton thinks will only get worse with the perfection of augmented reality-there are already AR tours of the Grand Canyon that seek to prove creationism is true. Bratton here seems mainly concerned with expanding the definition of who or what constitutes one. California has even passed legislation to limit their use. Admittedly, these short, relatively easy to make programs that allow automated posts or calls are a major problem.
Ironically, the very reason we have cellphones in the first place. Yet bots have also become the source of what many of us would consider not merely permissible, but desirable speech. Things might move even further in this direction as bots become increasingly more sophisticated and personalized. Given some issue to decide upon my bot could scan the position on the same by organizations and individuals I trust in regards to that issue. This is not to say that I agree with this form of politics, or even believe it to be workable.
Rather, I merely think that Bratton might be on to something here. That a key question in the User layer will be the place of bots- for good and ill. The Stack, as Bratton has described it, is not without its problems and thus he ends his book with proposals for how we might build a better Stack. We could turn the Stack into a tool for the observation and management of the global environment. We could give Users design control over the interfaces that now dictate their lives, including the choice to enter and exit when we choose, a right that should be extended to the movement between states as well.
We could use the power of platforms to revive something like centrally planned economies and their dream of eliminating waste and scarcity.
We could harness the capacity of the Interface layer to build a world of plural utopias, extend and articulate the rights and responsibilities of users in a world full of bots. Is Bratton right? Is this the world we are in, or at least headed towards. For my money, I think he gets some things spectacularly right, such as his explanation of the view of climate change within the political right:.
Yet, elsewhere I think his views are not only wrong, but sometimes contradictory. I think he largely misses how the Stack is in large part a product of American empire. He, therefore, misinterprets the spat between Google and China as a battle between two models of future politics, rather than seeing the current splintering of the internet for what it is: the emergence of peer competitors in the arena of information over which the US has for so long been a hegemon.
Bratton is also dismissive of privacy and enraptured by the Internet of Things in a way that can sometimes appear pollyannaish. Rather than being destined to plug everything into everything else, we may someday discover that this is not only unnecessary and dangerous, but denotes a serious misunderstanding of what computation is actually for.
Herein lies my main problem with the Stack : though radically different than Yuval Harari , Bratton too seems to have drank the Silicon Valley Kool Aid. The Stack takes as its assumption that the apps flowing out of the likes of FaceBook and Google and the infrastructure behind them are not merely of world-historical, but of cosmic import. Matter is rearranging itself into a globe spanning intelligence with unlikely seeds like a Harvard nerd who wanted a website to rate hot-chicks.
What I do buy is that the Stack as a concept, or something like it, will be a necessary tool for negotiating our era, where the borders between politics and technology have become completely blurred. Such an alternative version of the Stack, would not only better inform us as to what the Stack is, but suggest what we might actually do to build ourselves a better one.
Something has gone terribly off track when it comes to the nation-state. It has imploded in regions where it had been artificially imposed- the Middle East- is unraveling in some sections of Europe- such as Spain- and perhaps strangest of all, where successfully resurgent against the forces of globalization has done so within the context of an internationally networked, populist right where so-called nationalist align themselves to what are less nation-states than racial and religiously based empires, that is Russia and the United States.
Reference to the nation has been one way of answering the question: why should I obey the laws? Nationalism emerged in Europe where prior answers to why an individual should follow the laws included because God or the King says so. Being a criminal might lead to hell or the rack, and maybe even both. The nation replaced the myths of God and king with the myth of common origin and shared destiny. In the strict sense, the United States has never in its history been a nation-state in the European sense of the word, but possessed a hybrid form of legitimacy based in varying degrees on Protestantism, claims of white supremacy, and civic-nationalism.
In the latter, the legitimacy of the state is said to flow not from any particular ethnic group but from shared commitments among plural communities to a certain political form and ideal. Civic-nationalism remains the most effective and inclusive form of nationalism to this day. Yet after more than a half a century of having rejected both religion and race as the basis for its political identity, and embraced civic-nationalism as its foundation, the US is now flirting with the revival of atavistic forms of political authority in a way that connects them with strange bedfellows in Moscow and a European right-wing terrified of Islam.
The nation-state often gets a bad rap, but it has played a historical role well beyond inspiring jingoism and ethnic conflict.
Nationalism, as in the quest to establish a nation-state, was one of the forces behind the rise of democracy in the 19th century, served as the well-spring for the liberation of colonized peoples in the 20th century, and formed the basis of social democracy and the welfare-state in post-war Europe. Globalization seems to have undermined all of the positive legacies of nationalism and left us only with its shards, spewing forth monstrosities we thought the post-war world had killed.
We seem to be in a genuine crisis of legitimacy in which the question of who the state serves, and above all, who is considered inside and outside the community it represents, has been reopened.
And just like in the past, the alliance among the parties of the right is a partnership based on destroying the very connectivity that has made their strange international alliance possible.
It is an axis driven by the fear of what globalization has enabled, that sees the police state as the solution to a world in flux, and somehow, and perhaps differently than its earlier incarnation, is unable, despite all its bluster, to extract itself from the centripetal force of the global capitalism in which it is embedded. A slow moving counter-revolution whose mission lies less in national greatness than in bending the system to suit its own interests.
Still, we should count ourselves lucky to be living at the beginning of the 21st century rather than the 20th, for the fascists they should have been called hyper-nationalist of the last century could gain their mass appeal among the middle classes by positioning themselves as the only alternative to a genuinely revolutionary left.
Not only this, the military aspect of nationalism has changed immeasurably since Hitler and his goons in short-pants dreamed of Lebensraum. Wars over physical territory in the name of empire building no longer make sense , instead what constitutes territory has itself be redefined- more on that in a moment. Thus trying to understand hyper-nationalists today by looking at fascists from the past the last century is a sort of analytical mistake, for the game being played has radically changed.
Perhaps we could get our historical bearings if we extended our view further back into the past and looked at the way systems of political legitimacy have previously sustained themselves only to eventually unravel.
Communication technology has always been at the center of any system of political legitimacy because the state needs to not only communicate what the laws are, but why they should be followed. The Babylonians had their steele, and Emperor Ashoka had his pillars , both like billboards out of The Flintstones.
The medieval Church in Europe had its great cathedrals, a cosmic and human social order reified in stone and images blazed in stained glass.
Make a donation
David Graeber talked about jobs that he says qualify as employment but are pointless and unnecessary. C-SPAN has agreements with retailers that share a small percentage of your purchase price with our network. However, C-SPAN only receives this revenue if your book purchase is made using the links on this page. Please note that questions regarding fulfillment, customer service, privacy policies, or issues relating to your book orders should be directed to the Webmaster or administrator of the specific bookseller's site and are their sole responsibility. Panelists talked about books that have been challenged because of the race, ethnicity, religion, or sexual preference of…. Author E. A collection of segments from Book TV programs featured author talks about labor and unions.
Is Norton 360 Mining Ethereum In Your Computer? If It Is, They’ll Take a 15% Cut
The attack surface of a software environment is the sum of the different points for "attack vectors " where an unauthorized user the "attacker" can try to enter data to or extract data from an environment. The size of an attack surface may fluctuate over time, adding and subtracting assets and digital systems e. Attack surface sizes can change rapidly as well. Digital assets eschew the physical requirements of traditional network devices, servers, data centers, and on-premise networks. Attack surface scope also varies from organization to organization. An attack surface composition can range widely between various organizations, yet often identify many of the same elements, including:. Attack vectors include user input fields, protocols , interfaces , and services.
Why Palantir Shares Are Rising Today
Invitation Homes led big money's charge into single-family rentals. Critics say tenants' complaints show it skimps on upkeep, piles on fees to please investors. In California and across the country, landlord groups are waging a disinformation campaign to squash efforts to make rent more affordable. Campaigner has used the idea drawn from Discworld novels to register the disproportionate effect price rises have on the lower paid.
Dogecoin to allow annual inflation of 5 billion coins each year, forever
The most popular antivirus, Norton , made a miner out of everyone. Even though this has been going on for a while, the Internet recently found it out. And traditional Norton customers are livid about it. Seven months ago, when they were testing it, our sister site Bitcoinist reported on it and said:. Get best and latest bitcoin news today with coinsurges. The program is expected to expand to include all 13 million Norton customers in the coming months.
Norton 360 Now Comes With a Cryptominer
Thanks to the post-attack panic, there's a new layer of ineptitude and deceit your luggage is subjected to on its way to its destination which may not be your destination. Boing Boing's Cory Doctorow or rather, his luggage was recently subjected to the brutish charms of the Transportation Security Administration. Last week, TSA inspectors at Phoenix's Sky Harbor airport pried the locks off of my unlocked, "TSA-safe" suitcase before taping it shut again and loading it onto my London-bound flight. Here's what Doctorow's luggage looked like after the "TSA-safe" locking mechanism outmaneuvered the TSA agent in charge of crowbar-wielding and packaging tape application. This appears to be the luggage Doctorow "submitted" to the TSA although Doctorow's is possibly an earlier iteration , which then handled it with all the grace and skill of two male supermodels trying to retrieve files from a computer. The TSA should have had no trouble unlocking the suitcase using keys, rather than physically attacking it. Rimowa's site states that its luggage features "TSA combination locks.
For the First Time Ever, a Magic: The Gathering Deck has been Copyrighted
Members: Enter the conference to participate. All posts made in this conference are world-readable. RSS feed of new responses. Username Password Remember me on this computer Need help logging in?
John Biggs
RELATED VIDEO: Civil War General-Purpose Computing - Cory Doctorow - Talks at GoogleJohn Biggs is a writer, consultant, programmer, former East Coast Editor and current contributing writer for TechCrunch. He writes mainly about technology, cryptocurrency, security, gadgets, gear, wristwatches, and the internet. After spending his formative years as a programmer, he switched his profession and became a full-time entrepreneur andwriter. Here we see some first video of the unlocked, super-hacked 2. This is actually a completely new, essentially b.
TSA Agents Outwitted By Cory Doctorow's Unlocked, 'TSA-Safe' Suitcase
One Time Secret offers an alternative to sharing passwords or credit card numbers via text message with your friends or family. Share that link with your friend. If no one visits the link in seven days, it gets deleted. Of course, you have to trust the people behind One Time Secret, which has been in operation for 8 years. The password thing is very true. Pass phrases are the new passwords and if long enough are virtually unbreakable at this point.
How We Think About Storing Crypto is Broken
I want Bitcoin to die in a fire: this is a start, but it's not sufficient. Let me give you a round-up below the cut. Like all currency systems, Bitcoin comes with an implicit political agenda attached. Decisions we take about how to manage money, taxation, and the economy have consequences: by its consequences you may judge a finance system.
hee hee